<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the Shelf-Life of Social Media as a Standalone Expertise?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.networksolutions.com/2009/whats-the-shelf-life-of-social-media-as-a-standalone-expertise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/2009/whats-the-shelf-life-of-social-media-as-a-standalone-expertise/</link>
	<description>Small Business tips, interviews and conversations that provide advice and discussion about small business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bizsugar.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/2009/whats-the-shelf-life-of-social-media-as-a-standalone-expertise/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>bizsugar.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=2018#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What&#039;s the Shelf-Life of Social Media as a Standalone Expertise?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Upholding the grand tradition of new media titles not being particularly clear, there was a lot of speculation as to what the Times saw as the role of a social media editor. It was pretty safe to assume that it wasn’t simply an editor covering the so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What&#8217;s the Shelf-Life of Social Media as a Standalone Expertise?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Upholding the grand tradition of new media titles not being particularly clear, there was a lot of speculation as to what the Times saw as the role of a social media editor. It was pretty safe to assume that it wasn’t simply an editor covering the so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
