Which Is More Effective For You: Twitter or Facebook?

by Joe Loong on May 27, 2009

Subscribe



The following entry is a personal look at the relative effectiveness of Twitter vs. Facebook in getting responses from people — specifically, answers to questions. It’s based completely on anecdotal observation, and as such, solely applies to my own situation, and my own unique friend / follower makeup. So it’s probably completely worthless for anyone else (but I’m going to continue, anyway).

My experience over the past few months using both platforms is this:

* Twitter is better for getting clicks on links

* Facebook is better for getting answers to questions

The most recent example came when I threw out a question to the hive mind, asking, “Which replacement iPod I should get?” I posted it to Twitter, and it also got picked up and posted to my Facebook status (I almost never update it directly.)

I didn’t get a single response from Twitter, but did get a bunch of useful feedback on Facebook.

Looking at the Audience
In quantitative terms, I have more Facebook friends — 515 — than Twitter followers — 328. (I’m also following 275 people.) I’m not sure, but I don’t think this is a typical mix: my Twitter numbers seem to be on the low-end for someone in the social media / online community / social marketing / social self-promotion space.

There’s a good degree of overlap between the two audiences, though there are still a lot of folks in my personal social network who still don’t use Twitter (or use it reluctantly).

Also, despite the fact that I have more Facebook friends, I’ve generally exercised more discipline there in friending, as opposed to Twitter, where I’m following more people whom I’ve never met, or whom I’ve only met once at a conference or something.

So, in terms of the second observation, I guess I shouldn’t be surprised — because of audience composition, on Facebook, more people whom I actually know will see a given post of mine, and because I have more solid relationships with them, I’m more likely to get a response.

As to the clickthrough stats: bit.ly (which I’m pretty much using exclusively these days for URL-shortening and click tracking) is a little inconclusive. Generally, I’m seeing a 3-to-1 ratio of referrers from apps vs. Web pages. So I’m assuming that more of the bucket of “Email Clients, IM, AIR Apps, and Direct” referrers are coming from Twitter apps than Facebook apps. But that’s just a guess.

What’s It Mean? I Dunno — What Do You Think?
Like I said at the beginning, this just applies to my own friending style and follower composition. (Also see this Webmonkey entry looking at friend / follower relationships at Facebook, Twitter and Flickr.) I’m curious to see what your own experiences are. To put it in question format, I guess it’s:

* How many Twitter followers and Facebook friends do you have?

* In your experience, which is better for generating clicks, and which is better for getting answers?

* What else do you expect when you publish a Twitter post or Facebook status update?

* How do you think your friending style (i.e. selective vs. open) has influenced the type of responses you get when you post to either platform?

If you like, leave a comment below with your response.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz

Brought to you by Network Solutions®

  • I'm having the same experience, although I have more Twitter follows than FB friends, so for me, it was surprising at first to be getting more clicks and leads from FB, but like you, I think it has to do with the quality of the relationship. In fact, I see Twitter as the wide end of the social media funnel. FB is next, followed by LinkedIn, where I connect with very few people that I don't already know and the relationships are tighter. From there, my Ning site, www.MasteryCoachExchange.com is next, followed by my blog. Then there are my "true fans" and my customers. Thanks for bringing it up!
  • JMCzar
    Well, for me Twitter is just me "thinking out loud." FB is a real time-drain (which I don't have much of these days) so Twitter is a quick way to feel connected to people you know. Even though FB is a better way to converse, it sure can be daunting. There are certain conversations you really don't care to have and there's no easy way to filter out all the junk from your long lost college roomates. So, for me, Twitter lets you shout out and then slink back to work in your lifeless office.
  • Hey JMCzar -- one of my recurring themes about Twitter is that it's easier to broadcast than receive. Though for institutions and organizations, the monitoring aspect is probably more important -- are you using Twitter or any other social media for your work?
  • I think people just like to see what you post and have no intention of commenting on it. I think Twitter is a good learning tool in the sense that if you follow someone interesting you will learn quite a bit.

    I do agree Facebook is way more social.. People chat and others respond sometimes I think to just respond.
  • Kim -- thanks for the comment. Regarding that last bit: Funny, I usually say that about Twitter -- lots of times, people look at @replies as a convenient excuse to post more stuff. But like I've written before, presence is participation (and participation requires presence) -- if you're not there, you don't "exist".
  • I would agree with your assessment. Anytime I've posted questions on Twitter (which updates my Facebook status) I receive more feedback on Facebook while I seem to get more clicks to my blog from Twitter. I think Twitter is best for trying to build new relationships while Facebook gives opportunity to build existing relationships.
  • Steve -- interesting way to look at it. Might have something to do the the dimensionality of the data -- even though Twitter updates can have depth (especially when linking to other things), on the surface, it's all text, so it's a way to keep up with someone without investing as much into it. Or something. Will need to think more.
  • I think it's because of the more natural conversational tone that FaceBook has vs Twitter. I'm one of the "uses Twitter reluctantly" types. I tend to find that I, too, find much better feedback from FB. I have many more FB friends, and, I know most of them personally. To generate clicks, Twitter is the way to go, and I typically post short things that incite short answers- NOT the way I write on FB. My friending style likely is the largest influence toward the types of responses I get on FB, and also friendships are much more cultivated on that platform. And iffen' yer curious- I saw this question on both Facebook AND Twitter... and I clicked through from the FaceBook link.
  • Dawn -- I think there's also a scaling element, too. Despite the fact that I've got more FB friends, Twitter just generates (or seems to generate) more volume. The way the FB newsfeed works, it's easier to contextualize different types of activity (photos, links, statuses, invites, other requests, etc), which I think makes it easier to digest as a whole.
  • Yes..I would say twitter is more effective for marketing my ebooks, which is how I sometimes use it. Otherwise I am braindumping random stuff. facebook just feels like talking to friends.
  • Julia -- sounds about right to me. I've harped on this theme a few times; Twitter is inherently suited to broadcasting, especially once you pass three-digit friends/followers. But it really depends on your personal friend/follower composition, and what you're trying to get from either platform (and how you use each one)
blog comments powered by Disqus