Yet Another Article on Twitter: Just How Desperate Are You for Followers, Anyway?

March 17, 2009 :: Joe Loong

I started this article with a much more benign direction, but then a few things happend:

1. During the SocStardom2 event, social media marketer Dave Evans said about his management of Twitter followers (paraphrasing), “The goal is to have as many people in my network who can answer questions I don’t even have right now.” (As opposed to having more restrictive rules for friending/following on networks like Facebook and LinkedIn.)

2. About the same time, Julia Angwin wrote a pretty good Twitter 101 primer in her WSJ blog, where she quotes Biz Stone stating the eminently-obvious fact, “Twitter is fundamentally a broadcast system” (or as Valleywag put it, “Twitter is for self-promotion“).

3. A few minutes ago, I was just followed on Twitter by someone who:

* Had a keyboard mash username

* Whose only update was a “free laptop” spam URL

* Who was already following 2,000 people

* And, who aready had 100 followers

Now, #1 by itself is not too bad, and #2 is okay, too. But add 1+2, and you end up with people doing wacky stuff like #3, where people are so keen to build their follower network, that they indiscriminately and automatically follow anyone who follows them — even an obvious spammer… and probably also indiscriminately follows anyone, hoping for the reciprocal follow.

This “how do I get more followers?” question, of course, is eerily reminiscent of people playing the “How many friends do you have?” game on MySpace, and the answer is the same: Already be famous, and/or show a lot of cleavage.

Granted, Twitter looks to be a lot more useful at this point, but we’ll see how long that stays if barely-restrained Twitter follower-seeking becomes the norm. If anything is going to drive people off of Twitter, it’ll be this, and we’ll end up with a vast wasteland of self-promoting marketers blasting tweets at each other.

A-ha, you say, but wait: What about @replies? Doesn’t that make things actual conversations, and help build real relationships? Sure, but I would also argue that to a large extent, because @replies are public, it’s basically another excuse for you to show off to show off to all your followers.

It’s along the lines of a scene in Pulp Fiction (might be a deleted scene, I’ll have to check my copy later) where Mia asks Vincent if, “In a conversation, do you listen, or do you wait to talk?”

We know how Twitter self-promoters will (or should) answer that one.

Of course, unrestrained follower-seeking is only one of the user behaviors on Twitter. Over at Mashable, Elliot Kosmicki takes more reserved approach in The Twitter Followholic: An Epidemic.

Now, originally, I was going to ask what would be the best keywords to use to troll for Twitter followers (for example, I posted about how I was not going to SXSW this year, and instantly got added because by someone because I used the word “sxsw” in my post, which I don’t think anyone would find particularly useful.)

I’m still asking for your suggestions: What’s the best Twitter follower-bait? I’ll post them and my own concoctions from a new username I’ve set up for this purpose. And I’m going to make it clear that I will not follow you, because I’ll be twittering from @IWillNotFollowU.

So, just how desperate are you for followers? Leave a comment.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Propeller
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz


Comments are moderated and will appear shortly. See terms.

  • Not very desperate, actually. Even, finding the number of followers I've gathered (without really trying) pretty daunting. Not that I'm going to block people or ask them not to follow me, though.

    I love your image: "a vast wasteland of self-promoting marketers blasting tweets at each other."

    Thank goodness, we can choose not to follow those.

    I'm aware I'm not really answering your question (honestly, I really don't know what the best Twitter follower-bait is, apart from just being myself, which seems to have "worked" for me, if you look at it from that perspective).

    Yours is actually the second good Twitter article I've read today. The other one is http://www.stevelawson.net/wordpress/2009/03/tw... -- basically saying that if you find Twitter lame, you're just not following "the right people" for you. Just thought I'd point it out to you... in case.

    I'm not at #sxsw either this year, by the way ;-)
  • Stephanie -- yes, with c. 2300 followers, I can imagine you wouldn't be desperate at all. Though I see that with just under 500 following, you're still exercising discipline as to whom you follow.

    I skimmed the Lawson article and will have to give it more thought. At first blush I think it's based on kind of a strawman argument, though I agree that of course you get out of Twitter what you want.

    I still think that Twitter is weighed towards certain behaviors because it's broadcast-centric, and because all communications (save for DMs) are public, both of which really change the dynamic.

    Also, as the Twitter-sphere matures and mainstreams, just like the blogosphere, it's going to be harder for anyone outside of celebrities to accumulate the same kind of audience attention that the first-movers have been able to achieve.
  • afallison
    I'm just now really getting my feet wet with disqus. I am really loving the way it integrates with twitter and the other web 2.0 social platforms. ;)
  • Disagree, totally. Yes these people exist, but I'm not one of them. I hope. With the #followlimit imposed by Twitter [see http://tr.im/followlimit ] I can't follow all the people with the cool ideas, and Twitter took away track and left us with a bolted on search which doesn't integrate in your feed. I used to follow ideas and topics, but now I can't do that, I follow the people that 1 in 10 posts, mention those topics or ideas.

    I used to drink from the firehose, but the mere trickle I get from 2000 is barely enough to quench my thirst for the global zeitgeist and the power of dipping your hand in this river of thoughts, ideas and really cool stuff that is in peoples' everyday lives and doings is strangely compelling. I'm just wired differently I suppose.

    /rant
blog comments powered by Disqus