<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your search experience has gotten more relevant through Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.networksolutions.com/2009/your-search-experience-has-gotten-more-relevant-through-bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/2009/your-search-experience-has-gotten-more-relevant-through-bing/</link>
	<description>Small Business tips, interviews and conversations that provide advice and discussion about small business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Yeung</title>
		<link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/2009/your-search-experience-has-gotten-more-relevant-through-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-15292</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Yeung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 21:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=2059#comment-15292</guid>
		<description>@Smokey - I would think you&#039;re right that Microsoft has jumped from name to name over the past several years. It&#039;s been reported that the software giant will spend up to $100 million in advertising alone just to help raise brand awareness. It does seem curious that Microsoft would not keep the name Live Search and choose Bing. I wonder what the entomology of the word is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Smokey &#8211; I would think you&#39;re right that Microsoft has jumped from name to name over the past several years. It&#39;s been reported that the software giant will spend up to $100 million in advertising alone just to help raise brand awareness. It does seem curious that Microsoft would not keep the name Live Search and choose Bing. I wonder what the entomology of the word is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Yeung</title>
		<link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/2009/your-search-experience-has-gotten-more-relevant-through-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-3547</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Yeung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=2059#comment-3547</guid>
		<description>@Smokey - I would think you&#039;re right that Microsoft has jumped from name to name over the past several years. It&#039;s been reported that the software giant will spend up to $100 million in advertising alone just to help raise brand awareness. It does seem curious that Microsoft would not keep the name Live Search and choose Bing. I wonder what the entomology of the word is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Smokey &#8211; I would think you&#39;re right that Microsoft has jumped from name to name over the past several years. It&#39;s been reported that the software giant will spend up to $100 million in advertising alone just to help raise brand awareness. It does seem curious that Microsoft would not keep the name Live Search and choose Bing. I wonder what the entomology of the word is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokey</title>
		<link>http://blog.networksolutions.com/2009/your-search-experience-has-gotten-more-relevant-through-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-3524</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.networksolutions.com/?p=2059#comment-3524</guid>
		<description>it seems like Microsoft should stick with one name for their search engine functionality so that it has a chance to turn into a recognizable brand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it seems like Microsoft should stick with one name for their search engine functionality so that it has a chance to turn into a recognizable brand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
